Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes between Leadless and Conventional Transvenous Pacemakers Implantation: An Up-to-Date Meta-analysis. Posted on November 20th, 2024 by LEADconnection Post navigation Previous: Gradual development of left bundle branch current of injury during left bundle branch pacing lead implantation.Next: Ultrasound-guided versus Fluoro-guided Axillary Venous Access for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: A Patient-Based Meta-analysis.
Removal of leads broken during extraction: A comparison of different approaches and tools. Posted on November 20th, 2024 by LEADconnection Post navigation Previous: Decision-making regarding subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator as primary prevention in patients with low ejection fraction.Next: Gradual development of left bundle branch current of injury during left bundle branch pacing lead implantation.
Decision-making regarding subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator as primary prevention in patients with low ejection fraction. Posted on November 20th, 2024 by LEADconnection Post navigation Previous: A leadless ventricular pacemaker providing atrioventricular synchronous pacing in the real-world setting: 12-Month results from the Micra AV post-approval registry.Next: Removal of leads broken during extraction: A comparison of different approaches and tools.